MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999894583 · doi:10.1176/pn.41.8.0001a

Psychiatry Match Numbers Drop Slightly After Five Years of Increase

2006· article· en· W1999894583 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychiatric News · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPrimary Care and Health Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedical schoolPsychiatryChild and adolescent psychiatryDrop outFamily medicinePsychologyMedicineMedical education

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Back to table of contents Next article Education & TrainingFull AccessPsychiatry Match Numbers Drop Slightly After Five Years of IncreaseMark MoranMark MoranSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:21 Apr 2006https://doi.org/10.1176/pn.41.8.0001aA total of 983 medical school graduates will enter PGY-1 general psychiatry residency programs this summer, according to the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP).Of those 983, there were 643 U.S. medical graduates who“ matched” into psychiatry residency programs around the country. That number is down slightly from last year's figure of 653 (see chart).In addition to the 643 U.S. medical graduates, 340 students—including mostly international medical graduates (IMGs), Canadian students, and U.S. students who graduated in previous years—also filled slots this year, for a total of 983.The figures for psychiatry represent a leveling off of U. S. medical student interest in psychiatry after a steady, albeit slow, increase in the previous five years.Figures for U.S. students matching into double-board programs are off slightly from the preceding year. The number of students entering medicine/psychiatry programs fell from 12 to eight, as did the number entering psychiatry/family medicine programs. However, the number matching into triple-board pediatrics/psychiatry/child psychiatry programs increased from 16 to 18.Finally, three U.S. seniors matched into PGY-2 programs, down from four last year. The net change in U.S. seniors entering all psychiatry programs this year is a reduction of 17 from last year.Because match results reflect the fields of medicine preferred by tomorrow's doctors, they are watched like tea leaves by educators and policymakers. Psychiatrist Sidney Weissman, M.D., who has maintained an active interest in workforce and training issues for many years and is the Area 4 trustee on APA's Board of Trustees, suggested that psychiatry's steady climb in interest among medical students in the past decade may have reached a plateau.He said that without vigilance on the part of psychiatric educators, numbers could begin to fall again—as they had done in the late 1980s—as students gravitate toward high-paying specialties such as anesthesiology and radiology. Weissman said that one area that could be especially important is psychiatric involvement in the structure of the psychiatry curriculum in medical school and in the selection of medical students.It is an area that is especially ripe since the Association of American Medical Colleges has begun to push for a 30 percent increase in the number of medical student slots in the United States to help forestall a projected physician shortfall in 2020.“To accomplish this recruitment of medical students, new schools will need to be formed and existing schools expanded,” he said. “Major reform will be needed in medical school curricula as well in assessing appropriate undergraduate training of U.S. medical school applicants. These proposed changes will give psychiatry an opportunity to assist in these critical activities. We can help develop new ways to make the medical school curriculum more involved in psychiatry. We can further aid in the reexamination of the criteria for acceptance to medical school and ensure that applicants who are interested in psychiatry and meet other qualifications can or will be accepted.“If we are to maintain the numbers of U.S. students entering our field, we will need to work on those areas of career choice where we can have an impact,” he said. “These are the structure of the psychiatry curriculum and the selection of medical students.”Weissman is director of psychiatry residency training at Northwestern University School of Medicine.More generally, Weissman has continually stressed over the years that the most important goal for the profession in terms of attracting students is to define clearly the “biopsychosocial” nature of psychiatry. And he reiterated the dependence of the American health care system on international medical graduates (IMGs), with one-fifth of all residency slots and one-third of all psychiatry slots being filled by IMGs.The NRMP is a private, not-for-profit organization established in 1952 to provide “an orderly and fair mechanism” to match the preferences of applicants to U.S. residency positions with the preferences of residency program directors for those applicants. The NRMP is sponsored by the American Board of Medical Specialties, the AMA, the Association of American Medical Colleges, the American Hospital Association, and the Council of Medical Specialty Societies.More information about the match and results for all specialties is posted online at<www.nrmp.org>.▪ ISSUES NewArchived

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.183
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it