MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1999938078 · doi:10.3917/rief.035.0019

Développement d'une plateforme Internet pour faciliter l'intervention précoce auprès des familles

2014· article· fr· W1999938078 on OpenAlexaff
Hubert Gascon, Isabelle Beaudoin, Dominic Voyer, Pauline Beaupré

Bibliographic record

VenueLa revue internationale de l éducation familiale · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicFamily and Disability Support Research
Canadian institutionsCentre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-AppalachesUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La nécessité et la pertinence d’entreprendre une démarche d’intervention précoce auprès de parents d’enfants chez qui est soupçonné un retard ou une anomalie dans son développement sont largement reconnues. Cet article présente le développement et le cadre d’évaluation du Programme interdisciplinaire d’accompagnement en ligne et d’entraide famille (PIALEF), un outil accessible en ligne (Internet) et élaboré en vue d’accompagner et de soutenir les parents en attente d’un diagnostic dûment établi ou de services du réseau de santé et de services sociaux. Élaboré en collaboration avec une équipe de chercheurs et de cliniciens, PIALEF s’inscrit dans une perspective de recherche développement et constitue un exemple de programme d’intervention préventif axé sur la résilience assistée. Cet article présente les assises qui ont guidé l’élaboration de cette plateforme interactive, les différentes phases de sa conception, son contenu et son fonctionnement. La procédure d’évaluation du programme qui est en cours est également présentée.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLa revue internationale de l éducation familialeSame topicFamily and Disability Support ResearchFrench-language works237,207