A Double Tyrosine Motif in the Cardiac Sodium Channel Domain III-IV Linker Couples Calcium-dependent Calmodulin Binding to Inactivation Gating
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Voltage-gated sodium channels maintain the electrical cadence and stability of neurons and muscle cells by selectively controlling the transmembrane passage of their namesake ion. The degree to which these channels contribute to cellular excitability can be managed therapeutically or fine-tuned by endogenous ligands. Intracellular calcium, for instance, modulates sodium channel inactivation, the process by which sodium conductance is negatively regulated. We explored the molecular basis for this effect by investigating the interaction between the ubiquitous calcium binding protein calmodulin (CaM) and the putative sodium channel inactivation gate composed of the cytosolic linker between homologous channel domains III and IV (DIII-IV). Experiments using isothermal titration calorimetry show that CaM binds to a novel double tyrosine motif in the center of the DIII-IV linker in a calcium-dependent manner, N-terminal to a region previously reported to be a CaM binding site. An alanine scan of aromatic residues in recombinant DIII-DIV linker peptides shows that whereas multiple side chains contribute to CaM binding, two tyrosines (Tyr(1494) and Tyr(1495)) play a crucial role in binding the CaM C-lobe. The functional relevance of these observations was then ascertained through electrophysiological measurement of sodium channel inactivation gating in the presence and absence of calcium. Experiments on patch-clamped transfected tsA201 cells show that only the Y1494A mutation of the five sites tested renders sodium channel steady-state inactivation insensitive to cytosolic calcium. The results demonstrate that calcium-dependent calmodulin binding to the sodium channel inactivation gate double tyrosine motif is required for calcium regulation of the cardiac sodium channel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".