Sujet, genre, corps et temps : La fiction féminine de Jean de la Croix et la construction discursive du sujet genré
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le Cantique spirituel et La vive flamme d'amour, de Jean de la Croix, sont lus ici comme exemples de construction discursive d'un genre féminin par un sujet masculin. L'objectif est de mesurer les caractéristiques et les limites d'une conception du genre comme performance (Butler) ou comme combinatoire (Probyn), conception courante en études des genres et qui postule un écart entre le sexe (naturel) et le genre (culturel et politique). Tout comme l'anthropologie sous-jacente aux deux poèmes de Jean de la Croix fait de « l'âme » le seul support du sujet, une approche post-structuraliste en études des genres peut renforcer un oubli du corps, surtout si elle est pratiquée par des hommes. L'auteur propose à cet égard un concept de corps comme sédimentation, qui prend en compte l'extension corporelle du sujet et de ses transformations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".