MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000016159 · doi:10.1073/pnas.0707732104

<i>Escherichia coli</i> succinate dehydrogenase variant lacking the heme <i>b</i>

2007· article· en· W2000016159 on OpenAlexafffund
Quang M. Tran, Richard A. Rothery, Elena Maklashina, Gary Cecchini, Joël H. Weiner

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMitochondrial Function and Pathology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Institutes of HealthFondation pour la Recherche MédicaleCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
KeywordsHemeBiochemistrySuccinate dehydrogenaseOxidoreductaseEscherichia coliRespiratory chainEnzymeChemistryCitric acid cycleBiologyElectron Transport Complex IGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Escherichia coli enzyme succinate:ubiquinone oxidoreductase [(succinate dehydrogenase (SdhCDAB)] couples succinate oxidation to ubiquinone reduction and is structurally and functionally equivalent to mitochondrial complex II, an essential component of the aerobic respiratory chain and tricarboxylic acid cycle. All such enzymes contain a heme within their membrane anchor domain with a highly contentious, but as-yet-undetermined, function. Here, we report the generation of a complex II that lacks heme, which is confirmed by both optical and EPR spectroscopy. Despite the absence of heme, this mutant still assembles properly and retains physiological activity. However, the mutants lacking heme are highly sensitive to the presence of detergent. In addition, the heme does not appear to be involved in reactive oxygen species suppression. Our results indicate that redox cycling of the heme in complex II is not essential for the enzyme's ubiquinol reductase activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.186

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSame topicMitochondrial Function and PathologyFrench-language works237,207