Customer access and competitive certainty: performance effects in Swedish foreign subsidiaries
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This article extends our understanding of performance effects of expansion barriers in different strategy contexts relevant to industrial firms. Effects of perceived obstacles to customer access are studied, and competitive certainty is acknowledged since barriers to a large extent originate from business strategies of competitors. The study explores patterns using data from subsidiaries of Swedish manufacturing firms in Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States. For units with a narrow product/market scope, the direct performance effects of customer access obstacles and competitive certainty are negative. On the other hand, in the narrow context competitive certainty moderates the relationship between customer access obstacles and performance, and this implicates a positive effect. There are no significant effects in the context of a broad product/market scope. Performance effects of barriers are, thus, more complicated than previously thought, and we need to pay attention to perceived competitive certainty and the strategy context. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it