MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000049686 · doi:10.14740/jmc.v6i5.2121

Vestibulophyma and Giant Rhinophyma Associated With Variant Rosacea

2015· article· en· W2000049686 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Austin Deng Chen, Chung‐Sheng Lai, Feng-Shu Chang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Cases · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRosaceaRhinophymaTurbinectomySurgeryConcomitantNoseDermatologyAcne

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In July 2013, a 44-year-old Taiwanese man was admitted to Kaohsiung Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital, presenting with a 3-year history of progressively growing nasal mass with pustules and foul smelling discharge. He is a victim of cerebrovascular accident 4 years ago, hypertension for 12 years, and left hemiplegia. He has no personal history of smoking or alcoholism. Facial disfigurement led to psychological distress, and he sought out residence at a nursing home as a social recluse. Examination revealed a giant pedunculated bulbar mass measuring 23 × 13 × 8 cm and extending from the forehead to over the tip of the nose, with complete obliteration of the normal nasal contour. MRI scan revealed extensive nasal cutaneous lobulated tumors with complete obstruction of his left nostril due to vestibular phymatous lesions. Following biopsy results, we diagnosed the patient with “vestibulophyma”, giant rhinophyma with extensive external phymatous lesions, and concomitant presentation of all four rosacea subtypes. After undergoing application of topical metranidazole jelly and low oral dose of doxycycline (40 mg/day) for 2 weeks, we proceeded with surgical intervention of giant rhinophyma de-bulking, vestibulophyma resection, inferior turbinectomy, and middle turbinectomy with microdebrider. Full thickness skin graft played an important role as an ideal and effective biological dressing during the healing process. The patient is currently well and satisfied with the results. J Med Cases. 2015;6(5):216-218 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jmc2121w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical CasesSame topicAcne and Rosacea Treatments and EffectsFrench-language works237,207