MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000067361 · doi:10.1002/mame.200700315

Short Palm Tree Fibers Polyolefin Composites: Effect of Filler Content and Coupling Agent on Physical Properties

2008· article· en· W2000067361 on OpenAlexaff
Abdelkader Bendahou, Hamid Kaddami, Henry Sautereau, Mustapha Raihane, Fouad Erchiqui, Alain Dufresne

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Materials and Engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNatural Fiber Reinforced Composites
Canadian institutionsUniversité du QuébecUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceComposite materialCompatibilizationPolyolefinCrystallinityUltimate tensile strengthMaleic anhydrideIzod impact strength testComposite numberPolyethyleneThermoplastic elastomerThermoplasticFiberFiller (materials)PolymerPolymer blendCopolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Short date palm tree lignocellulosic fibers have been used as a reinforcing phase in commodity thermoplastic matrices [poly(propylene) and low density polyethylene]. Compatibilization of the fibers was carried out with the use of maleic anhydride copolymers. The morphology, thermal and mechanical properties of the resulting composites were characterized using SEM, DSC and tensile tests. The reinforcing capability of the unmodified fibers was found to depend on the nature of the matrix and the main parameter governing the composite behavior was the degree of crystallinity of the matrix. Compatibilization was reported to enhance the mechanical performances for both sets of composites up to a critical amount of compatibilizer beyond which the degree of crystallinity of the matrix decreases. magnified image

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations78
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromolecular Materials and EngineeringSame topicNatural Fiber Reinforced CompositesFrench-language works237,207