MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000067361 · doi:10.1002/mame.200700315

Short Palm Tree Fibers Polyolefin Composites: Effect of Filler Content and Coupling Agent on Physical Properties

2008· article· en· W2000067361 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Materials and Engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNatural Fiber Reinforced Composites
Canadian institutionsUniversité du QuébecUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceComposite materialCompatibilizationPolyolefinCrystallinityUltimate tensile strengthMaleic anhydrideIzod impact strength testComposite numberPolyethyleneThermoplastic elastomerThermoplasticFiberFiller (materials)PolymerPolymer blendCopolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Short date palm tree lignocellulosic fibers have been used as a reinforcing phase in commodity thermoplastic matrices [poly(propylene) and low density polyethylene]. Compatibilization of the fibers was carried out with the use of maleic anhydride copolymers. The morphology, thermal and mechanical properties of the resulting composites were characterized using SEM, DSC and tensile tests. The reinforcing capability of the unmodified fibers was found to depend on the nature of the matrix and the main parameter governing the composite behavior was the degree of crystallinity of the matrix. Compatibilization was reported to enhance the mechanical performances for both sets of composites up to a critical amount of compatibilizer beyond which the degree of crystallinity of the matrix decreases. magnified image

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.788

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it