MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000075718 · doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.32959

Mosaic trisomy 1q: The longest surviving case

2009· article· en· W2000075718 on OpenAlexaff
Chirag Patel, Graham Hardy, P. Cox, Sarah Bowdin, C McKeown, Alison Bedford Russell

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part A · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutopsyPolyhydramniosMedicineAnatomyTrisomyHypoplasiaCorpus callosumKaryotypePathologyBiologyGestationChromosomePregnancyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present the longest known surviving case of a male infant with a mosaic complete trisomy 1q. Born at 39 weeks of gestation with respiratory distress, his weight was 3,330 g (25th centile); he had micrognathia, a posterior cleft of palate, abnormal ears and left thumb, syndactyly, and an absent corpus callosum. Initial blood karyotype was normal (46,XY). He died at age 5 months. Autopsy suggested aspiration as the primary cause of death and confirmed the antemortem findings of an absent corpus callosum and atrial septal defect. It also identified some central nervous system, cardiac, gastrointestinal, and lung anomalies not previously recognized. Cytogenetic analysis of skin fibroblasts obtained at autopsy showed a de novo unbalanced translocation between chromosomes 1 and 22: 46,XY,+1,der(1;22)(q10;q10)[25]/46,XY[65] in the cells examined. The previously reported cases had a similar phenotype with birth weight above the 50th centile for gestational age, small mouth, micrognathia, abnormal ears, abnormal fingers, microphthalmia, and hydrocephalus. The present case and a review of the literature delineates the phenotype in trisomy 1q, and reinforces the critical importance of effective communication between specialists, and obtaining permission for autopsy and skin biopsy, in the pursuit of a diagnosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.889
Threshold uncertainty score0.343

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part ASame topicGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesFrench-language works237,207