« Pour Monsieur le chanoine Groulx, qui m’a donné une âme » : les secrets de la dédicace
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé Personne ne contestera l'importance de la dédicace pour la connaissance de l'institution littéraire; cependant, la principale difficulté tient le plus souvent à la constitution d'un corpus significatif. Or, à ce chapitre, le cas de Lionel Groulx est remarquable, puisque sa bibliothèque (8 000 volumes et brochures) contient 712 ouvrages qui lui ont été dédicacés. Cette étude se fonde ainsi sur le corpus, afin de saisir les formes de la dédicace, les caractéristiques statistiques de cet ensemble et, enfin, le profil des dédicateurs et du dédicataire. Ce qui en ressort, c'est une nouvelle saisie des réseaux littéraires et de l'importance de Lionel Groulx.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it