Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cette étude de cas exploratoire de deux magasins coopératifs, l’objectif est d’établir leur profil culturel et de vérifier s’il y a un écart entre leur culture actuelle et leur culture souhaitée. Une approche qualitative comportant des entretiens approfondis, des observations et des revues documentaires est suivie d’une approche quantitative visant le personnel et les dirigeants. Le cadre des valeurs concurrentes est inclus dans un questionnaire ainsi que des questions sur l’orientation misant sur la primauté des membres. Les réponses pour les deux coopératives indiquent que la culture organisationnelle souhaitée est celle où les attributs du clan prédominent. La coopérative qui obtient le résultat le plus élevé dans l’auto-évaluation de son orientation est aussi celle où il n’y a pas d’écart culturel. La recherche présente des pistes quant à l’application de l’orientation misant sur la primauté des membres et quant à la culture ou l’identité coopérative comme avantage concurrentiel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".