MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000203823 · doi:10.1364/oe.14.010550

Circular birefringence dependence on chiral film porosity

2006· article· en· W2000203823 on OpenAlexafffund
Jason B. Sorge, Andy C. van Popta, Jeremy C. Sit, Michael J. Brett

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Express · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicOptical Coatings and Gratings
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsOpticsBirefringenceMaterials scienceSpecular reflectionScatteringBragg's lawTransmittanceThin filmAnisotropyPorosityCircular polarizationOptoelectronicsDiffractionPhysicsComposite materialNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Obliquely deposited thin films with helical microstructures exhibit circular Bragg effects. In this study, the effect of film porosity on the circular birefringence of helical thin films is investigated in TiO(2) films deposited at angles ranging from 30 degrees to 87 degrees in order to determine the various mechanisms responsible for the circular Bragg effects. Specular transmittance and diffuse scattering measurements indicate two film growth regimes of enhanced circular Bragg effects: The first regime is due to a maximum in form birefringence while the second regime is caused by strong anisotropic scattering.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.614

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptics ExpressSame topicOptical Coatings and GratingsFrench-language works237,207