Steam Reactivation of Spent CaO-Based Sorbent for Multiple CO<sub>2</sub> Capture Cycles
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examines steam reactivation of sorbent to improve the reversibility of multiple CaO-CO2 capture cycles. Experiments to obtain spent sorbent were performed in a tube furnace, and reactivation was achieved using steam in a pressurized reactor. Sorbent activity for CO2 capture was then tested in a thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA), in multi-cycle carbonation tests. After reactivation the sorbent had even better characteristics for CO2 capture than that of the natural sorbent. The average carbonation degree over 10 cycles for the reactivated sorbent approached 70%, significantly higher than for the original sorbent (35-40%). This means that the same sorbent may achieve effective CO2 capture over a large number of cycles, in the absence of other phenomena such as attrition. Partially sulfated sorbents may also be reactivated, but hydration itself is also hindered by sulfation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it