MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000269144 · doi:10.1063/1.3195641

Effect of threshold voltage instability on field effect mobility in thin film transistors deduced from constant current measurements

2009· article· en· W2000269144 on OpenAlexaff
Arman Ahnood, G. Reza Chaji, Andrei Sazonov, Arokia Nathan

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThin-Film Transistor Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooIGNIS Innovation (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThreshold voltageHysteresisTransistorMaterials scienceVoltageOptoelectronicsThin-film transistorInstabilityElectron mobilityField-effect transistorCondensed matter physicsTransient (computer programming)Electrical engineeringMechanicsPhysicsComputer scienceNanotechnologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The field effect (FE) mobility of thin film transistors is normally extracted using static measurement methods, which inherently rely on the assumption that the device remains stable during the measurement duration. However, these devices, particularly those based on emerging materials, can show large instability during the measurement, typically exhibiting hysteresis in the static characteristics. This letter looks at the effect of threshold voltage shift in FE mobility extracted using the conventional method, and introduces an alternative and more accurate technique of measuring device characteristics. The technique decouples the effect of transient phenomena, thus permitting extraction of the true device FE mobility, which turns out to be either over or underestimated depending on the magnitude and direction of threshold voltage shift.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics LettersSame topicThin-Film Transistor TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207