Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article analyse le développement des zones numériques de patrimoine culturel en Afrique centrale à travers les exemples d’un musée virtuel, le Musée national des Arts et Traditions du Gabon, et aussi du projet de la « Route des chefferies » dans les Grassland de l’ouest du Cameroun. Ces espaces virtuels construisent un objet singulier, représentant un état négocié de différents types de « conscience » patrimoniale, idéologiquement ouverts aux perspectives du public. Il vise donc à examiner comment collaborent différents acteurs nationaux et étrangers, les manières d’aborder l’impact et la puissance de la restructuration de ce battage médiatique sur des réalisations patrimoniales concrètes, et enfin, à analyser les différences entre les types de réalité virtuelle et de musées. L’article explore plus particulièrement l’émergence d’un nouveau statut pour le musée virtuel, un « musée-signe » qui est intégré dans le système sémiotique plus large du patrimoine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.823 | 0.671 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".