Light-addressable bacteriorhodopsin photocell
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bacteriorhodopsin (bR) thin films have been investigated in recent years as a viable biomaterial for constructing micro- or nanoscale optical devices. During illumination, the bR molecules in the thin film undergo a photocycle that is followed by a proton transport from the cytoplasmatic side to the extracellular side of the cell membrane. The photoelectric response induced by the charge displacement can be influenced by both the wavelength and intensity of the impinging light sources. A photocell based on the photoelectric properties of a thin bR film is described in this paper. The bR-based photocell is built as a sandwich-structural device with an ITO (Indium Tin Oxide) electrode/bR film/ITO electrode configuration. The photocell is fabricated by depositing the oriented bR film onto the grounded ITO electrode. The cytoplasmic side of the bR membrane is attached to the ITO conductive surface and the extracelluar side is placed in contact with the second ITO electrode that provides the signal input to the instrumentation circuit. A polyester thin film was used as the spacer separating the two ITO electrodes. The size of the active area of the photocell is about 10×10 mm. A HeNe laser coupled with an acoustic-optical scanning system is used as the light source. Experimental results confirm that the photoelectric response generated by the bR-photocell prototype is durable, stable, and highly sensitive to changes in light intensity. The sensitivity of the proposed signal transducer is 10.25mV/mW. The wavelength dependence of the photoelectric responses is similar to the optical absorption spectrum of bR membrane.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".