MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000300885 · doi:10.1002/jemt.10251

Endothelium and valvular diseases of the heart

2003· review· en· W2000300885 on OpenAlexaff
Richard L. Leask, Neelesh Jain, Jagdish Butany

Bibliographic record

VenueMicroscopy Research and Technique · 2003
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndothelial dysfunctionEndotheliumvalvular heart diseaseEndothelial stem cellPathogenesisMedicineHeart valveInflammationCardiologyInternal medicinePathologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It has become increasingly evident that the endothelium plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of valvular heart disease. The endothelium helps regulate vascular tone, inflammation, thrombosis, and vascular remodeling. Dysfunction of the endothelial cells has been linked to many vascular disorders including atherosclerosis. Common valvular diseases such as senile degenerative valve disease, myxomatous (or floppy) valves, rheumatic valves, and infective endocarditis valves show changes in the synthetic, morphologic, and metabolic functions of the valvular endothelial cells. These diseases are active processes related to endothelial cell dysfunction. Endothelial cell dysfunction is caused by mechanical forces, bacterial infection, autoantibodies, and circulating modulators of endothelial cell function. This study reviews the role of endothelial cell dysfunction in the more common valvular diseases. Continued research on endothelial cell dysfunction is crucial to our understanding of valvular heart diseases and may elucidate novel treatment and prevention strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.489
Teacher spread0.427 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations87
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicroscopy Research and TechniqueSame topicCardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207