Les origines de l’écriture migrante. L’immigration littéraire au Québec au cours des deux derniers siècles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au cours des deux derniers siècles, plus de cinq cents écrivains ont émigré au Québec dans des conditions et des circonstances variées. L’apport de ces écrivains à la vie littéraire du Québec est considérable: on constate que la part d'étrangers parmi les écrivains est deux fois plus importante que parmi la population en général. Quelquefois en marge des courants littéraires, parfois au coeur de la construction imaginaire nationale, les écrivains émigrés ont des parcours différents selon l'époque de leur arrivée, leur origine, leur langue et leur statut professionnel. De l'arrivée d'intellectuels révolutionnaires et de religieux ultramontains au XIXe siècle (Napoléon Aubin, Jules-Paul Tardivel), des grands voyageurs et exilés du début du XXe siècle (Marie Le Franc, Louis Hémon). de la première vague d'immigration européenne de l'après-guerre (Monique Bosco, Marco Micone) à la diversification continentale de la fin du siècle (Ying Chen, Sergio Kokis, Tecia Werbowski), l'histoire de l'immigration littéraire incite à une relecture de toutes les frontières et des constituantes de l'histoire culturelle du Québec.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".