MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000363304 · doi:10.1002/mop.22765

An accurate scaling approach for small‐signal modeling of high‐power HBT devices

2007· article· en· W2000363304 on OpenAlexaff
S. Bousnina

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrowave and Optical Technology Letters · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeterojunction bipolar transistorSmall-signal modelScalingMicrowaveSIGNAL (programming language)Electronic engineeringTransistorBipolar junction transistorPower (physics)HeterojunctionWaferElectrical engineeringEngineeringOptoelectronicsMaterials scienceComputer sciencePhysicsTelecommunicationsVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper presents an accurate scaling approach for small‐signal modeling of high‐power multi‐cell heterojunction bipolar transistors (HBTs). This approach is mainly based on the characterization of an elementary‐cell device and a proper modeling of the metalwork structure surrounding the transistor intrinsic part. The determined elementary‐cell small‐signal model is then scaled up to generate the S‐parameters of the multi‐cell device. An experimental validation was performed on a single‐cell and three‐cells GaAsHBT devices and excellent agreement was obtained between measured and simulated S‐parameters over frequency range 1–15 GHz. This modeling approach is particularly useful for on‐wafer characterization and modeling of high power HBT devices. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microwave Opt Technol Lett 49: 2429–2434, 2007; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/mop.22765

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.423
Threshold uncertainty score0.889

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrowave and Optical Technology LettersSame topicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207