MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000378259 · doi:10.1115/fedsm-icnmm2010-30394

Numerical Simulation of the Flow Around a Surface-Mounted Finite Square Cylinder

2010· article· en· W2000378259 on OpenAlexaff
Maryam Einian, Donald J. Bergstrom, David S. Sumner

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCylinderFinite volume methodWakeMechanicsDownwashTurbulenceGeometryPhysicsLarge eddy simulationImmersed boundary methodFlow (mathematics)Reynolds numberBoundary value problemClassical mechanicsMathematicsBoundary (topology)Mathematical analysisAerodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Large eddy simulation (LES) was used to study the unsteady turbulent flow over a surface-mounted square cylinder of finite height, for cylinder aspect ratios of AR = 3 and 5, at a Reynolds number of Re = 500. Employing a semi-implicit fractional step method for momentum and a pressure correction scheme for mass conservation, a collocated finite-volume code was used to solve the Navier-Stokes equations in three dimensions. A multi-grid scheme was employed to accelerate the pressure solver. The cylinder geometry was created on a Cartesian mesh using internal boundary conditions. The motivation for the study was to better understand the complex wake structure of the finite cylinder and the influence of the aspect ratio. The numerical results were consistent with the observations from experiments documented in the literature. For the case of AR = 3, the wake was dominated by downwash effects, where as for more slender cylinder, AR = 5, some upwash effects were noticeable closer to the ground plane.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.406
Threshold uncertainty score0.425

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFluid Dynamics and Vibration AnalysisFrench-language works237,207