MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000378940 · doi:10.1103/physreve.75.011604

Interface properties and microstructural stabilization in elastically inhomogeneous multiphase systems

2007· article· en· W2000378940 on OpenAlexaff
Danny Pérez, Laurent J. Lewis

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review E · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicnanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalRegroupement Québécois sur les Matériaux de Pointe
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFacetingMaterials scienceLattice (music)MicrostructureElasticity (physics)Kinetic energyCoupling (piping)Length scaleChemical physicsStatistical physicsCondensed matter physicsMechanicsClassical mechanicsComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using a two-dimensional multiscale model based on the classical time-dependent density-functional theory for lattice systems we recently introduced, we numerically study the impact of elastic inhomogeneities on the growth of isolated inclusions in multiphase alloys. We demonstrate that the coupling between the overall interface structure (as determined by the shape of the inclusions) and the local, atomic-scale structure can be very large, and is able to significantly affect the behavior of inclusions during growth. Elasticity is shown to have a strong influence on the local energetics at interfaces, leading to shape modulations and kinetic faceting. Morphological and energetic changes induce oscillations in the chemical potential of the inclusions, opening the way to the stabilization of multi-inclusion microstructures, consistent with experiment. We demonstrate that the interface elastic misfit is a key parameter for controlling the strength of elastic effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ESame topicnanoparticles nucleation surface interactionsFrench-language works237,207