MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000387372 · doi:10.1542/peds.2006-3757

Brainstem Involvement in Neonatal Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2 Encephalitis

2007· article· en· W2000387372 on OpenAlexaff
Gustavo Pelligra, Niamh E. Lynch, Steven P. Miller, Michael A. Sargent, Horacio Osiovich

Bibliographic record

VenuePEDIATRICS · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHerpesvirus Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsChildren's & Women's Health Centre of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrainstemMedicineHerpes simplex virusWhite matterEncephalitisDiffusion MRIPathologyCentral nervous systemCerebellumCerebral cortexVirusVirologyMagnetic resonance imagingInternal medicineRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Herpes simplex virus encephalitis in the newborn typically involves the cerebral cortex in a widespread manner. Herpes simplex virus type 2 rarely involves the brainstem. Here we report a 16-day-old infant with predominant brainstem and cerebellar involvement secondary to herpes simplex virus type 2 infection. Diffusion-weighted MRI performed 3 days after the onset of symptoms revealed restricted diffusion mainly in brainstem and cerebellar structures. No abnormal findings were seen on conventional MRI. Subsequent MRI scans showed evolution of the brain injury with extension along the corticospinal tracts. However, there was no evidence of any other supratentorial gray or white matter injury. This is the first report of predominant brainstem involvement in neonatal herpes simplex virus type 2 encephalitis. In addition, the importance of performing diffusion-weighted sequences to detect early central nervous system involvement and serial MRI to follow the evolution of central nervous system lesions is emphasized.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePEDIATRICSSame topicHerpesvirus Infections and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207