A randomized controlled trial to assess alendronate‐associated injury of the upper gastrointestinal tract
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Aminobisphosphonates are recommended for postmenopausal osteoporosis but have been associated with injury to the upper gastrointestinal tract. AIM: To conduct a randomized controlled trial, to assess the endoscopic damage caused by alendronate and its effect on gastric mucosal prostaglandin synthesis. METHODS: Seventy-six healthy volunteers age 40-60 years, with normal baseline endoscopy were randomly assigned to treatment with: (A) ASA 650 mg q. d.s.; (B) alendronate 10 mg o.d.; or (C) placebo o.d. for 14 days. Mucosal injury scores on day 14 of treatment were reported by a blinded endoscopist. Gastric biopsies were analysed for prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) concentration by radioimmunoassay. RESULTS: Oesophageal injury did not differ among treatment groups. Gastric ulcers developed in five out of 26 subjects given ASA, two out of 25 given alendronate, and none of 25 given placebo. The mucosal damage scores for the alendronate group exceeded those for the placebo group in the gastric body but not at other sites. Injury scores for ASA exceeded those for placebo in the duodenum, antrum, body, and fundus. The mean change in log10[PGE2] (ng/mg protein) was - 0.07 for placebo, - 0.80 for ASA, and + 0.62 for alendronate (differences not significant). CONCLUSIONS: Alendronate is associated with injury and ulceration of the gastric mucosa. This effect was not associated with any significant change in gastric mucosal PGE2 levels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".