MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000398211 · doi:10.1029/2005gl025035

A structural study of an interior layered deposit in southwestern Candor Chasma, Valles Marineris, Mars, using high resolution stereo camera data from Mars Express

2006· article· en· W2000398211 on OpenAlexaff
Frank Fueten, Robert Stesky, Paula MacKinnon, Ernst Hauber, K. Gwinner, F. Scholten, Tanja Zegers, G. Neukum

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutions3M (Canada)Brock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMars Exploration ProgramGeologySedimentary depositional environmentLithologyHigh resolutionFault (geology)BasementGeomorphologyPaleontologyAstrobiologyRemote sensingStructural basinArchaeologyPhysicsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An interior layered deposit (ILD) within Western Candor Chasma of Valles Marineris, Mars, is examined using data from the High Resolution Stereo Camera of the Mars Express mission. Most ILD layers dip in the same direction as the topographic slope. Exposed, rotated fault blocks of basement lithology appear to penetrate the cover of this ILD deposit in at least two locations. These features suggest a simple drape morphology over basement topography consisting of rotated fault blocks. This interpretation constrains possible hypotheses of ILD formation and suggests a limit on total volume of ILD material. Draping implies low‐energy deposition, either subaerially or in deep water, and that the total volume of ILD is considerably less than indicated by the size of the mound. A dark competent unit unconformably caps part of the ILD indicating a multistage depositional history.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.616
Threshold uncertainty score0.649

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research LettersSame topicPlanetary Science and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207