MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000417540 · doi:10.1243/095440504323055524

A fuzzy system for chatter suppression in end milling

2004· article· en· W2000417540 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B Journal of Engineering Manufacture · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced machining processes and optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Fuzzy logicVibrationMachiningController (irrigation)End millingEngineeringControl engineeringComputer scienceControl (management)Mechanical engineeringPhysicsAcousticsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper reports a fuzzy logic approach for chatter suppression in end milling processes. Vibration energy and the peak value of a vibration frequency spectrum are jointly used as chatter indicators and inputs to the proposed fuzzy controller. The outputs of the fuzzy controller are the altered machining parameters for chatter suppression. This approach does not require a pre-selected nominal spindle speed and has avoided the difficulties in selecting spindle speed modulation parameters present in several other spindle speed variation methods. Experimental results show that chatter can be effectively suppressed by altering spindle speed alone or by simultaneously adjusting feed and spindle speed. However, chatter cannot be suppressed by feed adjustment alone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.862
Threshold uncertainty score0.611

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it