MEMORIUM A Road to Learning With a Character as Noble as an Orchid and a Career as Steady as a Pine Tree
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dr Zhu Shoumin was a steadfast friend who believed in the warmth of friendship.Zhu gave his all to those that knew him.He was a shining light that guided us with his happy enthusiasm, visionary NUTRIOLOGICAL thinking and his exemplary work ethos and energy.In the last 30 years, he coauthored important classic article that have been published in the international journals and he made contributions to presentations in India, UK, Canada.We will always think of him as a great friend and his parting is a great loss.We in the International College of Nutrition knew him for the last 30 years, planned great adventures with him in India and China as well as in Canada on Cardiovascular Diseases and somehow these should be kept alive.He organised the 5th World Congress on Clinical Nutrition at Zhejiang Medical University, Hangzhou, China in 1995 which is unforgettable.For members of the International College of Nutrition worldwide, including Indian and Canadian friends, Zhu Shoumin remains an integral part of what we do.After China, India was his second country, where he enthusiastically described the role of Konjac food in cardiovascular diseases.His real home, of course, was and remains worldwide and beyond, the sphere of the human mind, what Edouard Le Roy, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin and above all Vladimir Ivanovich Vernadsky called the noösphere, the sphere of human creativity, complementing Eduard Suess's (the Viennese geophysist) biosphere.Zhu helped takeing us a step beyond the noösphere by examining both the basic rules and their applications emphasizes the role of foods rather than nutrients, in the prevention of chronic diseases in 1990.These were steps toward introducing nutrients into Nutrition Science when he brought us the idea of foods.By seeking new approach to quantitatively assess the role of foods with otherwise qualitative nutrients, we can prevent diseases in a broader view by preventing CVDs we also prevent type 2 diabetes mellitus and brain degeneration by this functional food approach.By this idea and approach, Zhu Shoumin acted like Confucius as well as as like Hippocrates, which had
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.012 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.063 | 0.025 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".