Reactive uptake of NO3 radicals by unsaturated fatty acid particles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The reactive uptake of NO(3) by particles containing four unsaturated fatty acid species was studied for the first time in a flow tube reactor coupled to a chemical ionization mass spectrometer (CIMS). Using a mixed-phase relative rates technique, the reactive uptake coefficients, γ(part), were determined to be (0.27 ± 0.06) for oleic acid (OA), (0.53 ± 0.12) for linoleic acid (LA), (0.72 ± 0.17) for linolenic acid (LNA), and (1.01 ± 0.18) for conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) in N(2) bath gas. In the presence of 20% O(2), their uptake coefficients are (0.31 ± 0.09) for OA, (0.55 ± 0.12) for LA, (0.78 ± 0.17) for LNA, and (1.08 ± 0.17) for CLA. All the uncertainties are 2σ and represent precision only. The products of the NO(3) reactions with these organic particles were studied in the presence and absence of O(2) using CIMS. It was found that the detected yields and compositions of the products were substantially different with or without O(2). Based on the observed products and general gas-phase chemistry of NO(3) radicals, a reaction mechanism is proposed for NO(3) reactions with unsaturated organic particles. The atmospheric implications of the heterogeneous chemical processes involving NO(3) are also discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".