MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000501213 · doi:10.1149/1.3374340

Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy Approach Curves for Ring Microelectrodes in Pure Negative and Positive Feedback Mode

2010· article· en· W2000501213 on OpenAlexafffund
Renaud Cornut, Margarita Mayoral, Dimitri Fabre, Janine Mauzeroll

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicElectrochemical Analysis and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les TechnologiesUniversité du Québec à Montréal
KeywordsMicroelectrodeScanning electrochemical microscopyElectrodeElectrochemistrySubstrate (aquarium)Ring (chemistry)MicroscopyMaterials scienceVoid (composites)ChemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)NanotechnologyOpticsComposite materialPhysicsChromatographyPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Herein, we report a theoretical study of ring microelectrode scanning electrochemical microscopy approach curves in pure positive and negative feedback modes. The dependence of the simulated approach curves with characteristic dimensions of the ring microelectrode is studied, and accurate analytical approximations are proposed. Moreover, in the specific case of ring micropipet electrodes, the filling level and geometric parameters of the internal void of the pipet affect the transient current distribution. Micropipet design guidelines are therefore suggested that may facilitate quantitative kinetic studies of the underlying substrate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Electrochemical SocietySame topicElectrochemical Analysis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207