MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000512005 · doi:10.1063/1.1288680

Nonlinear stimulated Brillouin scattering in inhomogeneous plasmas

2000· article· en· W2000512005 on OpenAlexafffund
A. V. Maximov, Ralf M. Oppitz, W. Rozmus, V. T. Tikhonchuk

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Plasmas · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicDust and Plasma Wave Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsBrillouin scatteringPlasmaNonlinear systemSaturation (graph theory)IonConvectionAcoustic waveBrillouin zoneScatteringAtomic physicsIon acoustic waveScalingComputational physicsQuantum electrodynamicsOpticsMechanicsQuantum mechanicsLaser

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The combined effects of ion-acoustic nonlinearity and plasma inhomogeneity on a stimulated Brillouin scattering (SBS) are considered in the model of coupled Korteweg–de Vries (KdV) and electromagnetic wave equations. In the regime of linear ion-acoustic waves the results are in good agreement with the existing linear theories of SBS and demonstrate the regimes of both convective and absolute instabilities. New features of SBS saturation due to ion-acoustic nonlinearity and pump depletion in inhomogeneous plasmas are found. They include the scaling for saturated reflectivity, the transition from convective to absolute growth, and the temporal pulsations of the reflectivity coefficient. The autoresonance process is analyzed and its relevance to SBS for realistic plasma parameters is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of PlasmasSame topicDust and Plasma Wave PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207