Surface electrochemistry of <font>N,N',N″,N‴</font>-tetramethyl-tetra-3,4-pyridinoporphyrazinocobalt(II)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The complex N,N',N″,N‴ -tetramethyl-tetra-3,4-pyridinoporphyrazinocobalt(II) ([ Co II TMPz [4+])4+ adsorbed on a graphite electrode undergoes spontaneous reduction, forming a surface containing Co I. Five reversible surface peaks are observed at low pH, two of which are two-electron concerted processes. At high pH, one of these two-electron processes splits into two one-electron waves. Both oxidation and reduction of the central metal can be observed, along with successive reduction steps involving the porphyrazine ligand. Notable is the marked shift to positive potentials of these processes, relative to unsubstituted cobalt phthalocyanine, due to the positive charge localized on the porphyrazine. The electrocatalytic activity of this complex modified electrode toward the reduction of hydrogen peroxide is also reported. We demonstrate that a series of different surfaces exist which are obtained by variation of pH and polarization potential and that these surfaces possess differing electrocatalytic activity. Surfaces inactive to hydrogen peroxide can exist at potentials more negative than active surfaces even though the driving force for peroxide reduction will be greater for the former.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".