MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000565666 · doi:10.1021/ac034520z

Determination of Hyperforin in Mouse Brain by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry

2003· article· en· W2000565666 on OpenAlex
Jan-Henning Keller, Michael Karas, Dietrich A. Volmer, Gunter P. Eckert, Mona Abdel‐Tawab, Henning Blume, Theo Dingermann, Manfred Schubert‐Zsilavecz

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytical Chemistry · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicNatural Compound Pharmacology Studies
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Marine Biosciences
FundersDeutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
KeywordsHyperforinChemistryChromatographyElectrospray ionizationMass spectrometryTandem mass spectrometryHypericum perforatumDetection limitExtraction (chemistry)Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometryPharmacology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hyperforin is one of the essential active ingredients of St. John's wort extract, which is used as an antidepressant for mild to moderately severe depressions. In vitro and in vivo data as well as several clinical studies and meta analyses have confirmed the pharmacological effect of treatment with hyperforin-containing preparations. However, little is known about the brain availability of hyperforin until now. Accordingly, a highly sensitive and selective LC/MS method for this purpose was developed and validated. This method proved suitable for the determination of hyperforin in mouse brain, after oral administration of hyperforin sodium salt and St. John's wort extract. This method involves liquid-liquid extraction of hyperforin with ethyl acetate followed by separation with rapid reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry detection using electrospray ionization. Excellent linearity was obtained for the entire calibration range from 0.25 to 10 ng/mL (corresponding to 2.5-100 ng/g brain tissue concentration, calculated with the factor derived from sample processing) with an average coefficient of correlation of 0.9992. The recovery of hyperforin from mouse brain homogenates was between 71.4 and 75.3% with a relative standard deviation of less than 3%. Validation assays for the lower limit of quantitation yielded an accuracy of 5.8%. Intraday accuracy and precision for the developed method were between 4.6 and 10.6% and 4.3-8.4%, respectively, while the interday parameters varied between 6.7 and 12.2% for accuracy and 2.0-5.0% for precision. After the method validation, hyperforin brain levels in mice, treated with 15 mg/kg hyperforin (either as the sodium salt or as 5% St. John's wort extract), were investigated. The average concentration of hyperforin found for the sodium salt group was 28.8+/-10.1 ng/g of brain (n = 8), which was somewhat higher than the hyperforin concentration of 15.8+/-10.9 ng/g of brain (n = 8), determined in the extract-treated group. This method is robust, selective, and highly sensitive and represents an appropriate tool to further prove the occurrence and distribution of hyperforin in mouse brain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.402

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it