MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000623685 · doi:10.1029/2009jb007134

Lamé parameters of common rocks in the Earth's crust and upper mantle

2010· article· en· W2000623685 on OpenAlexaff
Shaocheng Ji, Shengsi Sun, Qian Wang, Denis Marcotte

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyCrustMineralogyGeothermal gradientSedimentary rockMantle (geology)Shear modulusPoromechanicsGeophysicsThermodynamicsPorosityGeochemistryGeotechnical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lamé parameter ( λ ) and shear modulus ( μ ) are the most important, intrinsic, elastic properties of rocks. The Lamé parameter λ , which relates stresses and strains in perpendicular directions, is closely related to the incompressibility and contains a high proportion of information about the resistance to a change in volume caused by a change in pressure. Recent studies have emphasized the roles played by λ in the discrimination of gas sands from carbonates and shale in sedimentary basins and in the seismic reflection of crustal fault zones. Here we analyze the equivalent isotropic elastic data of 475 natural rocks in order to characterize λ values for common types of crystalline rocks in the Earth's crust and upper mantle and their variations with pressure (P), temperature (T), and mineralogical composition. When no partial melting, metamorphic reaction, dehydration, or phase transformation occurs, λ of a crystalline rock as a function of P and T can be described by λ = a + (d λ /d P ) P − c exp(− kP ) − (d λ /d T ) T , where a is the projected λ value at zero pressure if microcracks were fully closed; d λ /d P is the pressure derivative in the linear elastic regime; c is the initial λ drop caused by the presence of microcracks at zero pressure; k is a decay constant of the λ drop in the nonlinear poroelastic regime; and d λ /d T is the temperature derivative. The parameter λ increases nonlinearly and linearly with increasing pressure at low (<∼300 MPa) and high (>∼300 MPa) pressures, respectively. In the regime of high pressures, λ decreases quasi‐linearly with increasing temperature with d λ /d T values in the range of 1–10 × 10 −3 GPa/°C. Approaching the α ‐ β quartz transition temperature, quartzite displays negative λ values. In the λ ‐ ρ (density) and μ ‐ λ plots, the main categories of lithology can be clearly distinguished. The ultramafic rocks display systematic decreases in both μ and λ with increasing the degree of serpentinization. Eclogites, mafic rocks (gabbro, diabase, mafic granulite, and mafic gneiss), and felsic rocks (granite, diorite, felsic gneiss, intermediate gneiss, and metasediments) are characterized by high, moderate, and low μ and λ values, respectively. For pyroxene and olivine, both λ and ρ increase, but μ decreases with increasing the Fe/Mg ratios. In the plagioclase series, both λ and μ increases with increasing the anorthite content. Increases in the contents of garnets, sillimanite, rutile, zircon, ilmenite, and spinel result systematically in an increase in rock's λ and μ values. The present results provide improved constraints on the discrimination of composition for crustal and upper mantle rocks in terms of λ and μ .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.498
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207