El «derecho penal del enemigo»: de la teoría actual a la práctica represiva del «Nuevo Estado» franquista
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El objetivo de este artículo es descartar las críticas de contenido moral que se le han hecho al llamado «Derecho penal del enemigo» por los supuestos lazos con el «decisionismo soberano» de entreguerras. Sin entrar en el debate entre juristas acerca de si es «Derecho» legítimo o no lo es, se va a defender la idoneidad del uso de la categoría jakobsiana para caracterizar el Derecho penal totalitario, en este caso el Derecho penal del primer franquismo. A modo de aproximación, se van a enumerar algunas de las técnicas punitivas de la dictadura desde los elementos que definen hoy al Derecho penal del enemigo, con el objetivo de defender la utilidad del concepto como categoría comparable, no solamente con el presente, sino entre los distintos -ismos históricos.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it