MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000645103 · doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2344

Geotechnical Challenges and Strategies at McArthur River Operation

2011· article· en· W2000645103 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaoyou Yun, Kerry McNamara, Gregory Murdock

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia Engineering · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRock Mechanics and Modeling
Canadian institutionsCameco (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeotechnical engineeringMining engineeringGeologyInflowGroundwater

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High pressure water inflow has been identified as one of the most critical challenges in mining the world's highest-grade uranium deposit at McArthur River Operation, Cameco Corporation. The ore deposit is approximately 530 m below surface and adjacent to the water bearing Athabasca sandstone, graphitic, and highly altered ground. This paper summarizes the comprehensive geotechnical challenges and corresponding strategies that have been used over years to successfully develop and mine the deposit. These comprehensive ground control strategies have been proven to be efficient and satisfactory to the risk tolerance of the operation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.158 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProcedia EngineeringSame topicRock Mechanics and ModelingFrench-language works237,207