MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000651092 · doi:10.1109/cisp.2013.6743922

Algorithm of heart sound segmentation and feature extraction

2013· article· en· W2000651092 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Liping Liu, Weilian Wang, Gang Yuan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSound (geography)SegmentationHeart soundsBioacousticsEnergy (signal processing)Feature extractionSIGNAL (programming language)Computer scienceHeart diseaseFeature (linguistics)Pattern recognition (psychology)Speech recognitionArtificial intelligenceAlgorithmMathematicsAcousticsMedicineCardiologyPhysicsTelecommunicationsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, an algorithm about heart sound signals segmentation was described, in which only heart sound signals were used. The algorithm was based on the normalized average Shannon energy of heart sound signals. 20 cases of normal and 20 cases of abnormal heart sound signals of heart valve disease selected randomly from the database of the Institute of Research Clinique of Montréal were used for testing. The features of each component, such as AR spectrum energy in systolic period were extracted after segmentation. The energy of high frequency is generally less than -95db to normal signal. Reversely, the energy of high frequency is generally more than -95db for abnormal signal. This feature is valuable in diagnosis of congenital heart diseases and other cardiac diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhonocardiography and Auscultation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207