Carbonic anhydrase II promotes cardiomyocyte hypertrophy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pathological cardiac hypertrophy, the maladaptive remodelling of the myocardium, often progresses to heart failure. The sodium-proton exchanger (NHE1) and chloride-bicarbonate exchanger (AE3) have been implicated as important in the hypertrophic cascade. Carbonic anhydrase II (CAII) provides substrates for these transporters (protons and bicarbonate, respectively). CAII physically interacts with NHE1 and AE3, enhancing their respective ion transport activities by increasing the concentration of substrate at their transport sites. Earlier studies found that a broad-spectrum carbonic anhydrase inhibitor prevented cardiomyocyte hypertrophy (CH), suggesting that carbonic anhydrase is important in the development of hypertrophy. Here we investigated whether cytosolic CAII was the CA isoform involved in hypertrophy. Neonatal rat ventricular myocytes (NRVMs) were transduced with recombinant adenoviral constructs to over-express wild-type or catalytically inactive CAII (CAII-V143Y). Over-expression of wild-type CAII in NRVMs did not affect CH development. In contrast, CAII-V143Y over-expression suppressed the response to hypertrophic stimuli, suggesting that CAII-V143Y behaves in a dominant negative fashion over endogenous CAII to suppress hypertrophy. We also examined CAII-deficient (Car2) mice, whose hearts exhibit physiological hypertrophy without any decrease in cardiac function. Moreover, cardiomyocytes from Car2 mice do not respond to prohypertrophic stimulation. Together, these findings support a role of CAII in promoting CH.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".