MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Acrosin activity in pelleted frozen sperm does not correlate with in vitro fertilization of oocytes

2009· article· en· W2000683460 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAndrologia · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSperm and Testicular Function
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreMcMaster University Medical CentreMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcrosinHuman fertilizationAndrologySpermInseminationOocyteIn vitro fertilisationSemenBiologyChemistryAnatomyEmbryoMedicineGeneticsAcrosome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spermatozoa pelleted after swim-up were frozen and then analysed in batches for acrosin activity, using a spectrophotometric method, and expressed as microIU micrograms DNA-1. A total of 259 sperm samples were analysed and the acrosin activity compared with fertilization in vitro. Of these, 224 samples fertilized at least one oocyte and 35 samples failed to fertilize any oocyte. Analysis by Student's t-test indicated that there was a statistically significant difference (P = 0.02) in acrosin activity between the two groups. However, when samples that failed to fertilize were matched for concentration, motility and normal morphology with samples that fertilized, this significance was lost (P = 0.77). It is concluded that total acrosin in pelleted sperm frozen after regular swim-up, does not correlate with fertilizing ability of spermatozoa used for insemination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.483
Threshold uncertainty score0.236

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it