Symptomatic Children With Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical and genetic characteristics of symptomatic children with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: The HHT clinics in Toronto. PARTICIPANTS: All children with symptomatic HHT treated from April 1, 1996, through December 31, 2002. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were screened for visceral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). Molecular testing was performed in the children or their affected family members. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of epistaxis, telangiectases, pulmonary and cerebral AVMs, and genetic characteristics. RESULTS: Fourteen children presented with manifestations of HHT. Seven had cardiorespiratory symptoms related to pulmonary AVMs. Three had neurological symptoms secondary to bleeding from spinal or cerebral AVMs. Two were referred because of skin telangiectases and 2, because of multiple episodes of epistaxis. Screening results revealed a cerebral AVM in 1 of 11 neurologically asymptomatic children. Of the children without respiratory symptoms, 1 was diagnosed as having definite and 1, suspected pulmonary AVMs. Four children with pulmonary AVMs carried an endoglin gene mutation (HHT type 1), and 1 carried an activin receptor-like kinase 1 gene mutation (HHT type 2). The 2 children with spinal AVMs belong to the same HHT type 2 family. No mutation was found in 1 child with pulmonary and 1 with cerebral AVMs. CONCLUSIONS: Visceral AVMs and mucosal telangiectases are present in children with HHT and can lead to life-threatening events. Failure to identify a disease-associated mutation for each child suggests complex mutations or novel HHT genes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".