MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000707492 · doi:10.5539/res.v7n8p8

Determinants of Integration Approach in the Agrarian Sphere Development in Contexts of Transformation

2015· article· en· W2000707492 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of European Studies · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture Market Analysis Ukraine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgrarian societyHierarchyEconomic systemAgricultureValue (mathematics)SociologyPolitical scienceEconomicsComputer scienceGeographyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article discusses theoretical aspects of integration approach to the study of the development of the agrarian sphere of economy. The article presents authors who have made significant scientific contributions to the theory of integration; identifies structural elements of the national agro-industrial complex; determines the value of scientific and technological progress in the development and integration of productive forces; identifies factors affecting the development of the agrarian sphere as a complex integrated system. The article notes that integration as a system possesses characteristics of self-organization, hierarchy, striving for equilibrium, and has the presence of a common goal. The article particularly characterizes the socio-economic factors of integration, influencing the agricultural sphere development and management. Particular emphasis is placed on the problem of integration of Russian agricultural industries in the WTO.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.954
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it