Anesthetic Management in the Case of Premature Infant with Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia and Retinopathy of Prematurity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this case report, we present the anesthetic management towards an infant with atelectasis o f the right lung, and with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), for whom laser treatment is planned for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). This female infant weighing 950 grams and born through normal vaginal delivery at the 27th gestational age was transferred to our hospital following the diagnosis of BPD and ROP. Standard monitorization was performed for the patient and sevoflurane induction with O 2 was administered, and a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) was placed. One minute later, the patient’s peripheric oxygen saturation (SpO 2 ) decreased to 70%. Considering that the increased secretion of the patient should be aspirated, endotracheal intubation was performed. Concordantly, it was observed that the SpO 2 of the patient reached 100% and this value was maintained until the end of the surgery. We conclude that, when administering general anesthesia to these patients, instead of the placement of a LMA , the direct endotracheal intubation would be more efficient to ensure a patent airway and easily aspirate secretions. doi:10.4021/jmc2010.06.101e
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".