MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000710583 · doi:10.1086/431364

Investigating Ca<scp>ii</scp>Emission in the RS Canum Venaticorum Binary ER Vulpeculae Using the Broadening Function Formalism

2005· article· en· W2000710583 on OpenAlexaff
Evgenya L. Shkolnik, G. A. H. Walker, S. M. Ruciński, D. Bohlender, T. J. Davidge

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astronomical Journal · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsHerzberg Institute of AstrophysicsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsLongitudeFlareLight curveStarsSpectral lineBinary numberRadial velocityEmission spectrumBinary starAstronomyLatitude

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The synchronously rotating G stars in the detached, short-period (0.7 days), partially eclipsing binary ER Vul are the most chromospherically active solar-type stars known. We have monitored activity in the Ca II H and K reversals for almost an entire orbit. Rucinski's broadening function formalism allows the photospheric contribution to be objectively subtracted from the highly blended spectra. The power of the broadening function technique is also demonstrated by the good agreement of radial velocities with those measured by others from less crowded spectral regions. In addition to strong Ca II emission from the primary and secondary, there appears to be a high-velocity stream flowing onto the secondary, where it stimulates a large active region on the surface 30°–40° in advance of the subbinary longitude. A model light curve with a spot centered on the same longitude also gives the best fit to the observed light curve. A flare with ∼13% more power than at other phases was detected in one spectrum. We suggest that ER Vul may offer a magnified view of the more subtle chromospheric effects synchronized to planetary revolution seen in certain 51 Peg–type systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astronomical JournalSame topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesFrench-language works237,207