MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000806001 · doi:10.3139/146.110440

Progress in chemistry modelling for vapour and aerosol transport analyses

2010· article· en· W2000806001 on OpenAlexaff
Matthew H. Kaye, M.P. Kissane, PaulK. Mason

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Materials Research (formerly Zeitschrift fuer Metallkunde) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNuclear Materials and Properties
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAerosolTransport phenomenaNuclear engineeringEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental chemistryChemistryMeteorologyThermodynamicsPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The ASTEC/Sophaeros computer code has been developed to model transport of reactive gases and aerosols in pipe flows with extensive coverage of chemical and physical phenomena. As part of the ASTEC severe-accident code co-developed by IRSN in France and GRS (Gesellschaft für Anlagen- und Reaktorsicherheit) in Germany, it is principally used to evaluate so-called radioactive source terms released to the environment in the event of potential accidents affecting water-cooled nuclear reactors. A major uncertainty in the past concerned the impact of chemistry on radioactivity transfer where the treatment of chemical phenomena was recognized as inadequate. Work described here, involving mainly systematic identification of relevant species and thermodynamic- data verification, has vastly improved this situation leading in particular to creation of a comprehensive database with fully-referenced sources of information. Further prospective improvements in this area are described.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Materials Research (formerly Zeitschrift fuer Metallkunde)Same topicNuclear Materials and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207