MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000823384 · doi:10.5539/ijc.v3n4p69

Hydrogen Cyanide Content of Manihort Utilissima, Colocasia Esculenta, Dioscorea Bulbifera and Dioscorea Domentorum Tubers Found in Benue State

2011· article· en· W2000823384 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
B. A. Anhwange, Kaana Asemave, Barnabas Aloo Ikyenge, D.A. Oklo

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Chemistry · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCassava research and cyanide
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColocasia esculentaDioscoreaCyanideChemistryHydrogen cyanideBotanyHorticultureBiologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The hydrogen cyanide contents of Manihort utilissima (Cassava), Colocasia esculenta (Coco yam), Dioscorea bulbifera (Aerial yam) and Dioscorea domentorum (Trifoliate yam) Tubers found in Benue State were determined in their fresh and dried forms. The amount of hydrogen cyanide found in the fresh state was 304.60 mg•100g-1, 34.10 mg•100g-1, 49.70 mg•100g-1 and 79.40 mg•100g-1 for Manihort utilissima, Colocasia esculenta, Dioscorea bulbifera and Dioscorea domementeroum respectively; while the amount observed in the dry form was 249.50 mg•100g-1, 17.30 mg•100g-1, 32.50 mg•1200g-1 and 55.10 mg•100g-1 for Manihort utilissima, Colocasia esculenta, Dioscorea bulbifera and Dioscorea domementeroum respectively. Higher hydrogen cyanide contents were observed in the fresh samples than the dried samples. Manihort utilissima was found to have the highest values both in the fresh and the dried forms. Statistical analysis of the mean values of hydrogen cyanide content of the tubers indicates a significant difference between the fresh and the dried forms of the tubers. The study revealed that tubers of these plants have relatively high content of hydrogen cyanide content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.310
Threshold uncertainty score0.458

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of ChemistrySame topicCassava research and cyanideFrench-language works237,207