MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000823867 · doi:10.5539/res.v6n1p143

Fiscal Sustainability of Eurozone Governments: An Empirical Review of the Past Decade

2014· article· en· W2000823867 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Astrid Ayala, Szabolcs Blazsek

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of European Studies · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFiscal Policies and Political Economy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFiscal sustainabilitySustainabilityUnit rootEconomicsFiscal policyConstraint (computer-aided design)MacroeconomicsGross domestic productDebtGovernment (linguistics)Government debtFiscal unionEmpirical evidenceMonetary economicsEconometrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We provide an empirical review of fiscal sustainability of Eurozone governments by using quarterly data on debt to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and primary deficit to GDP over the period 1999 to 2010. We verify the conditions of fiscal sustainability, defined by the government’s present value borrowing constraint, by applying unit root tests that involve one, two, or multiple structural breaks. We select the best performing model of structural breaks and group Eurozone governments with respect to fiscal sustainability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.740
Threshold uncertainty score0.488

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReview of European StudiesSame topicFiscal Policies and Political EconomyFrench-language works237,207