MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000831509 · doi:10.3109/14992020903410110

International classification of functioning, disability, and health core sets for hearing loss: A discussion paper and invitation

2010· article· en· W2000831509 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Audiology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalInstitut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal
FundersOticon Fonden
KeywordsInternational Classification of Functioning, Disability and HealthPsychologyHearing lossHumanitiesMedicineAudiologyRehabilitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The World Health Organization’s International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) has adopted a multifactorial understanding of functioning and disability, merging a biomedical paradigm with a social paradigm into a wider understanding of human functioning. Altogether there are more than 1400 ICF-categories describing different aspects of human functioning and there is a need to developing short lists of ICF categories to facilitate use of the classification scheme in clinical practice. To our knowledge, there is currently no such standard measuring instrument to facilitate a common validated way of assessing the effects of hearing loss on the lives of adults. The aim of the project is the development of an internationally accepted, evidence-based, reliable, comprehensive and valid ICF Core Sets for Hearing Loss. The processes involved in this project are described in detail and the authors invite stakeholders, clinical experts and persons with hearing loss to actively participate in the development process.SumarioLa Clasificación sobre Funcionalidad, Discapacidad y Salud de la Organización Mundial de la Salud (ICF) ha adoptado un acercamiento multifactorial de la funcionalidad y la discapacidad, fusionando un paradigma biomédico con un paradigma social de una forma más amplia. En su conjunto hay más de 1400 categorías ICF que describen diferentes aspectos de la funcionalidad humana y existe la necesidad de desarrollar una lista corta de categorías ICF para facilitar el uso de la clasificación en un esquema para la práctica clínica. Es de nuestro conocimiento que actualmente no existe un instrumento de medición estándar que facilite una forma válida y cómoda para evaluar los efectos de la hipoacusia en la vida de los adultos. El propósito de este proyecto es desarrollar un conjunto básico de condiciones de salud ICF para la hipoacusia que sea internacionalmente aceptado, basado en evidencia, confiable e integral. Se describen en detalle los procesos implicados en este proyecto y los autores invitan a las personas interesadas, a los expertos clínicos y a las personas con hipoacusia a participar activamente en el desarrollo de este proceso.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.704
Threshold uncertainty score0.221

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it