MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000849837 · doi:10.1080/15298660008984592

A Method for the Analysis of Butyltin Chlorides in Air by Gas Chromatography with Atomic Emission Detection

2000· article· en· W2000849837 on OpenAlexaff
Laurie M. Allan, D. K. Verma, Fan Yang, Y. K. Chau, Roma Maguire

Bibliographic record

VenueAIHAJ - American Industrial Hygiene Association · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMarine Biology and Environmental Chemistry
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaMcMaster UniversityHamilton Health Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryGas chromatographyTropoloneChromatographyChelationAcetic acidTributyltinTolueneExtraction (chemistry)Atomic emission spectroscopySodium diethyldithiocarbamateChlorideFiberBromideNuclear chemistryInductively coupled plasmaInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistryPlasma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An initial screening test compared the use of tropolone (2-hydroxy-2,4-6-cycloheptatrienone) in acetic acid with sodium diethyldithiocarbamate (NaDDC) as chelating agents for the extraction of butyltin chlorides from glass fiber filters and XAD-2 resin tube. NaDDC was chosen for subsequent analyses. Mono-, di-, and tributyltin chloride were spiked onto glass fiber filters and XAD-2 resin, extracted in toluene with NaDDC and derivatized with pentylmagnesium bromide. Derivatized butyltin species were determined by gas chromatography with plasma atomic emission detection. Glass fiber filters and XAD-2 resin were found to provide high retention of butyltin compounds during sampling and efficient recovery of butyltin compounds by extraction with NaDDC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIHAJ - American Industrial Hygiene AssociationSame topicMarine Biology and Environmental ChemistryFrench-language works237,207