La question sociale à la question nationale: la revue Cité Libre (1950-1963)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les catégories sur lesquelles repose le débat sur l'avenir politique du Québec demeurent trop souvent prisonnières du discours politique actuel. À faire du fédéralisme et du nationalisme des entités inaliénables et incommensurables, on rapporte trop souvent leurs formes contemporaines à celles d'avant-guerre. On omet ainsi de rappeler que tous deux ont, durant les années 1960, puisé en partie à une semblable philosophie politique. Explorant les idéologies véhiculées par les intellectuels regroupés autour de Cité libre, cette note de recherche vise à mieux comprendre comment le « fédéralisme » des cité-libristes, avant que d'être une allégeance au Canada, est une adhésion à un système politique qui découle d'une philosophie dite personnaliste pouvant également légitimer le projet souverainiste.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".