The Pseudo A <sub>LT</sub> Periprosthetic Fracture: It’s Really a B2
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Periprosthetic fracture of the proximal femur involving the lesser trochanter (the Vancouver type A(LT)) is an uncommon occurrence. As it is basically an avulsion fracture of the attachment of the iliopsoas, it does not destabilize the stem and can be treated nonsurgically. In contrast, there is a so-called type "new B2" periprosthetic fracture of the lesser trochanter, which includes a segment of the proximal medial femoral cortex. This is usually seen within 6 weeks of the index procedure, typically following insertion of a tapered, cementless stem within a demineralized femur. This may be due to an unrecognized intraoperative fracture that subsequently displaced under load, or it may occur soon after, during rehabilitation. It is important to distinguish this fracture from the type A(LT), because it is associated with destabilization of the stem and requires early reintervention. The principles of treatment depend on the timing of the fracture and the size of the medial fracture fragment. If recognized intraoperatively as a nonpropagated cortical crack, then extraction of the broach or stem followed by cerclage cable fixation and reinsertion of the stem is adequate in most cases, with protected weight bearing for 6 weeks. If diagnosed postoperatively, or if the fracture fragment is larger, then management with a stem that gains fixation distal to the fracture is required. This distinction between the pseudo type A(LT) and the type "new B2" is important to recognize if appropriate treatment is to be prescribed and a satisfactory outcome is to be assured.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it