A modified mammalian tandem affinity purification procedure to prepare functional polycystin‐2 channel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The tandem affinity purification (TAP) procedure was initially developed as a tool for rapid purification of native protein complexes expressed at their natural levels in yeast cells. This purification procedure was also applied to study interactions between soluble proteins in mammalian cells. In order to apply this procedure to mammalian membrane proteins, we created a modified TAP tag expression vector and fused with the PKD2 gene, encoding a membrane cation channel protein, polycystin-2, mutated in 15% of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. We generated epithelial Madin-Darby canine kidney cell line stably expressing TAP-tagged polycystin-2, improved the subsequent steps for membrane protein release and stability, and succeeded in purifying this protein. Using patch clamp electrophysiology, we detected specific polycystin-2 channel activities when the purified protein was reconstituted into a lipid bilayer system. Thus, this modified TAP procedure provides a powerful alternative to functionally characterize membrane proteins, such as ion channels, transporters and receptors, using cell-free system derived from mammalian cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".