MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2000907296 · doi:10.1088/0960-1317/15/1/008

Large-area microfabrication of three-dimensional, helical polymer structures

2004· article· en· W2000907296 on OpenAlexafffund
Anastasia Elias, Kenneth D. Harris, Cees W. M. Bastiaansen, Dirk J. Broer, Michael J. Brett

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Micromechanics and Microengineering · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanofabrication and Lithography Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMicrofabricationPolymerMaterials scienceNanotechnologyEngineering drawingMechanical engineeringEngineeringComposite materialFabrication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A technique has been developed to fabricate polymeric helixes with sub-micron dimensions. These helixes are made using a double-templating process, in which an inorg. thin film deposited using glancing angle deposition acts as the master. The shape, pitch, handedness and no. of turns of the polymer helixes can be tuned by altering the deposition parameters of the master film. The structure of this pos. master is copied into a neg. intermediate template of photoresist, which itself acts as a master for the templating of polymer helixes. This process is demonstrated with four multifunctional acrylates. The master, intermediate template and polymer helixes are characterized using SEM, and the polymer helixes are characterized using energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy. It is shown that a large no. of polymer helical microstructures, which are anchored to both a thick substrate and a thin capping layer, can be made in parallel over areas of mm2 to cm2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.244
Threshold uncertainty score0.613

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Micromechanics and MicroengineeringSame topicNanofabrication and Lithography TechniquesFrench-language works237,207